Stop Leaving Money on the Table — Free Guide — Propos'Ability
Procurement Pricing Guide

Stop leaving money
on the table.

Why charging a margin % — not a markup % — protects your profit at every price point, regardless of vendor discount.

Get the free guide

Enter your email to download the full PDF guide + use the interactive calculator below.

Please enter a valid email address.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. Used to send your download link.

Your guide is ready.

Click below to download the full PDF — and scroll down to use the interactive calculator.

Download PDF Guide ↓

The discount isn't the issue.
The formula is.

Most interior designers were taught to price procurement the same way: get the vendor cost, apply a markup percentage, and charge that to the client. It feels logical. The vendor gives you a number, you add a percentage on top, done.

But here's what that method actually does: it hands control of your profit margin to the vendor. Every time a trade discount is low, every time vendor pricing shifts, every time freight adds cost — your margin moves with it. Silently.

The fix isn't chasing better trade discounts. It's changing the math you use to calculate your selling price in the first place.

"Markup puts the vendor in control of your profit. Margin puts your financial architecture in control of your profit."

Free PDF Guide
Get the full formula breakdown + conversion table
Printable. Shareable with your team. Yours free.

Same words.
Different math.

Markup and margin are used interchangeably — and that's exactly where the damage starts. They are not the same calculation. They produce different selling prices, different profit dollars, and a meaningfully different picture of your firm's financial health.

Markup — cost-forward
Measured against what you paid
Markup % = (Price − Cost) ÷ Cost
Selling Price = Cost × (1 + Markup %)

The vendor's cost anchors your price. Your margin floats with every pricing change they make.

Margin — revenue-forward
Measured against what you charge
Margin % = (Price − Cost) ÷ Price
Selling Price = Cost ÷ (1 − Margin %)

Your target margin anchors your price. Your profit holds regardless of what the vendor charges you.

The gap that
compounds quietly.

At 30–50% — exactly where design procurement operates — the difference between markup and margin isn't cosmetic. It's thousands of dollars per project that disappear without a trace.

Markup %Actual margin earnedThink you keep (per k)Actually keep (per k)Gap
10%9.1%001
20%16.7%0067−3
100%50.0%,00000−00

A designer charging 40% markup believes she's keeping 40 cents on every dollar. She's keeping 28.6 cents. The highlighted rows are where most designers operate.

Stop the leak
Download the guide — includes the selling price formula you need
Free PDF. Apply it on your next project today.

Working backwards from
a margin target.

When you know vendor cost and want a selling price that produces a specific margin, the formula inverts. You solve for the price at which cost is the right proportion of revenue.

The margin selling price formula
Selling Price = Cost ÷ (1 − Target Margin %)

Your margin target anchors the calculation. The vendor's cost is an input — not the anchor.

The same sofa.
Very different outcomes.

A designer sources a sofa. Vendor cost: ,400. Target: 40% gross margin on procurement.

Example — ,400 vendor cost — 40% target
Markup method (most designers)
Formula,400 × 1.40
Selling price,360
Profit60
Actual margin28.6%
Margin method
Formula,400 ÷ 0.60
Selling price,000
Profit,600
Actual margin40.0% ✓
Difference on this one item
Compounds across every item on every project
+40 profit
from one formula change
Take it with you
Download the guide — so you have this formula every time you price
Includes the conversion table, the formula, and the full side-by-side example.

Four reasons margin is the
right framework.

01
Margin holds as costs scale

A 40% markup on a 00 item and a ,000 item both produce only 28.6% margin — but the dollar gap from your target grows with every larger purchase. Margin holds at target regardless of cost basis.

02
Margin speaks your P&L's language

Overhead, labor cost, and profitability targets are all percentages of revenue. Procurement margin should match that framework — or you can't read the firm's full financial picture consistently.

03
Margin absorbs cost volatility

When freight shifts or discounts fluctuate, markup locks you into a narrower profit band tied to vendor pricing. Margin reprices cleanly because the anchor is your selling price, which you control.

04
Margin is vendor-independent

Low trade discounts stop being a threat. A 15% discount just sets your cost input. Your selling price comes from your margin target — not from what the vendor decided to offer this season.

Free Download
All four principles — plus the formula — in one printable guide
Share it with your team. Reference it before every procurement quote.
See the difference
on your numbers.

Enter any vendor cost, your percentage target, and your actual project budget. Toggle between markup and margin to see exactly what each method produces and what you're leaving behind.

$
%
$

Your financial architecture
sets the price. Not the vendor.

Trade discounts will always vary. Some lines offer 40% to the trade; others offer 15%. None of that needs to determine your profit margin. When your selling price is derived from a margin target — not a markup applied to vendor cost — your profitability becomes a function of your financial standards.

The formula is simple. The discipline is the practice. Apply it to every procurement item, on every project, and your margin stops being a variable that drifts with vendor pricing and starts being a standard you hold.

"A low trade discount isn't a pricing problem. It's a cost input. Your margin target determines your selling price — not the vendor."

Ready to apply this?
Download the guide and use the formula on your next quote
Free PDF — includes the formula, conversion table, and worked example.